Bournemouth And Boscombe Supporters Union, a new supporters group has been launched today - CourtOffside reacts to the news.
In the past few years there have been various discussions among a number of members of the
former AFCBISA committee about bringing the organisation out of mothballs.
The difficulty that this idea has always faced is in establishing a raison d'etre for the
organisation. We already have a Supporters Trust which is a representative body for supporters.
They are an established group and are recognised by the football club. Why would people want to
join a second group? What function does it serve? Why should the football club listen to any other
supporters' group's views?
With hindsight of course, we should never have put AFCBISA into mothballs without a real
strategy for bringing it out again. There wasn't much choice though, the committee was becoming
spread too thinly with members being involved in more and more at the football club - with the
Mutual, Youth Fund representation and various supporter working groups that were set up. We always
wanted new fresh blood to come in and succeed us - it never came.
I am utterly convinced of the need for a supporters' organisation aside from the Trust. I
have a very particular vision for what the Supporters Trust should be and what its activities
should comprise of - but it is also clear to me that that is not shared by the Trust's committee.
When it was born as the Community Mutual, the Supporters Trust was envisaged as having a much
wider role than it currently serves. It has several aims and objectives in its constitution that
would see it work in the community to promote football, run coaching courses, youth football and
undertake activities to bring the community into the football club. Aside from Debbie Harris'
excellent work on the Junior Cherries (which I would argue should have a much clearer Supporters
Trust branding to show people that the ST is providing this function for the club) the Trust does
absolutely nothing to further any of these objectives and suffers from tunnel vision that focuses
solely on its representative function. The Supporters Trust is failing because of that tunnel
vision. Its committee are well intentioned but are simply making the mistake of only focussing on
the football club and not of themselves as an organisation. Rob Trent tried valiantly to rectify
this but was sadly unable to turn the juggernaut's path alone - and so it rumbles on, ineffective
and its credibility shot to pieces.
We do need a purely representative supporters' group - but that should not be the function of
the Supporters' Trust. The Trust should command respect not only from the football club and its
supporters but the wider community and the council. It should have gravitas. Gravitas that it earns
from the things it does and provides the supporters and the community. However we do need a group
that can be a pain in the backside to the club, one that holds the Supporters Trust itself to
account and is not constrained by the need to maintain diplomatic and/or working
relationships.
From the discussions about the reformation of AFCBISA came the BFC. Part of the reason for
starting the BFC was to create a membership organisation that had a reason for being - albeit a
social one - that could then evolve a representative function in its relations with the football
club. The membership grew strongly but was not active enough in using the facility to be
sustainable. The time for the BFC in a social aspect may well come again. The Inn Off The Bar,
whilst an attractive option on matchdays is not a supporters' bar or clubhouse and is really not
viable for the kinds of small fundraising social evenings that the BFC would excel at. I digress,
however.
A new supporters group has been launched today - the Bournemouth and Boscombe Supporters
Union and as posts on the forum from those involved show, they are seeking to acheive full trade
union affiliation and are offering free membership for the first year - clearly in order to give
them some kind of representative credentials.
The launch of the BBSU is interesting, but is bound to be shrouded in difficulties for the
very reasons that meant that AFCBISA was never relaunched. I await news of those involved in its
committee with interest. I sincerely hope that they have sought guidance and/or involvement from at
least some of us who have been through this process before and know many of the pitfalls that they
may face in the immediate, medium and long term - and I hope that they have a real vision for the
bigger picture of supporter representation and community involvement in the football club - rather
than simply militancy brought about by the last few months of turmoil at Dean Court. The reaction
to the launch from many has been predictable and the group will need to weather this and
demonstrate exactly what it is they stand for and what role they see themselves as having. They
cannot afford to be seen soleley as splitters from the established Trust - but I fear that they
need the Trust to change as much as they need to forge their own identity - and they cannot do that
in isolation.


